Spooked by prosecutions of Bitcoin sellers and pending money-laundering guidelines, The Bitcoin foundation on Tuesday noted that the digital currency is not absolutely cash and asked lawmakers to investigate the United States department of Justice’s pursuit of merchants promoting it. In a letter to the United States Senate Judiciary Committee, Llew Claasen, the foundation’s executive director, expressed opposition to section thirteen of the preventing money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Counterfeiting Act of 2017.
That part of the proposed regulation, added in May by Senators Chuck Grassley, Dianne Feinstein, John Cornyn and Sheldon Whitehouse would increase record keeping necessities, used to track money laundering, to cryptocurrencies. Llew Claasen contends that Bitcoin is not actually money, at least in the sense contemplated by the bill, and therefore should not be treated as such.
Llew Claasen wrote:
“Bitcoin lacks the characteristic of economic tools or monetary merchandise which S 1241’s section thirteen attempts to regulate.”
Conflicting views among nation and federal organizations on how cryptocurrencies need to be regulated, Claasen insists, suggest additional research should be undertaken earlier than Congress passes laws affecting Bitcoin and its ilk. Llew Claasen additionally takes problem with the lawmakers’ claim that terrorists are using digital currencies.
Llew Claasen said:
“Contrary to this announcement, there’s little to no systemic evidence that terrorist companies use cryptocurrencies. In truth, the usage of money or different assets, including art trafficking, represents a much more danger for the regulation enforcement community.”
Claasen points out those United States regulations could not prevent terrorists from using economic systems based outside the nation. povrh toga, he argues that cryptocurrencies make a poor choice for criminal interest due to blockchain leaves a crypto footprint that investigators can follow.
Citing three prosecutions of Bitcoin dealers since 2011, Llew Claasen goes on to decry the DoJ’s use of cash transmitting regulations to move after Bitcoin dealers. Bitcoin isn’t covered below these legal guidelines, and if Congress wants it to be, legislators need to amend the suitable statute. The department of the Treasury does not share that view. U 2013, the company mentioned that the definition of a money transmitter does not differentiate among real currencies and convertible cryptocurrencies.
In order to deter the targeting of Bitcoin dealers, Llew Claasen requested the Committee to have Congress’ investigative arm, the authorities’ accountability office, look at the DoJ’s pursuit of cryptocurrency instances.
In its criticism towards Nixa, Missouri, resident Jason Klein, one of the instances singled out by Llew Claasen, the DoJ said Bitcoin isn’t illegal and has legitimate uses. Iako, the regulation enforcement company takes a dim view of replacing Bitcoin for money. For that, it charged Klein with operating a money transmitting commercial enterprise without following licensing and business registration necessities. Klein pled guilty and, once sentenced, could face up to five years in jail for his lack of record maintaining and reporting.